Create Account
Log In
Dark
chart
exchange
Premium
Terminal
Screener
Stocks
Crypto
Forex
Trends
Depth
Close
Check out our API

URG
Ur-Energy Inc.
stock NYSEAMERICAN

At Close
May 16, 2025 3:59:30 PM EDT
0.7088USD+0.682%(+0.0048)3,067,443
0.00Bid   0.00Ask   0.0000Spread
Pre-market
May 16, 2025 9:28:30 AM EDT
0.7050USD+0.142%(+0.0010)2,833
After-hours
May 16, 2025 4:53:30 PM EDT
0.7100USD+0.169%(+0.0012)14,054
OverviewHistoricalExchange VolumeDark Pool LevelsDark Pool PrintsExchangesShort VolumeShort Interest - DailyShort InterestBorrow Fee (CTB)Failure to Deliver (FTD)ShortsTrendsNewsTrends
URG Reddit Mentions
Subreddits
Limit Labels     

We have sentiment values and mention counts going back to 2017. The complete data set is available via the API.
Take me to the API
URG Specific Mentions
As of May 17, 2025 11:18:37 AM EDT (10 minutes ago)
Includes all comments and posts. Mentions per user per ticker capped at one per hour.
5 days ago • u/Ind132 • r/FluentInFinance • it_means_the_government_is_implementing_this_plan • C
Moore said that income earned by the corporation could be taxed even if it hadn't been distributed. This seems straightforward as we already tax S-corporations that way.
Moore said that Eisner was relevant. The court said it wasn't relevant to this case.
That's different from saying that they reviewed Moore and said it was a sound decision.
And, Eisner wasn't about taxing unrealized gains. The theory is that the same reasoning would prevent URG taxes, but that has not been explicitly tested.
That said, I'm pretty sure this court would rule against a tax on unrealized gains. And, this congress would not pass such a tax so this court won't get a chance to rule on the issue.
In the distant future, if we have a congress that would pass such a tax, we may also have a different court.
sentiment 0.87
5 days ago • u/Ind132 • r/FluentInFinance • it_means_the_government_is_implementing_this_plan • C
Moore said that income earned by the corporation could be taxed even if it hadn't been distributed. This seems straightforward as we already tax S-corporations that way.
Moore said that Eisner was relevant. The court said it wasn't relevant to this case.
That's different from saying that they reviewed Moore and said it was a sound decision.
And, Eisner wasn't about taxing unrealized gains. The theory is that the same reasoning would prevent URG taxes, but that has not been explicitly tested.
That said, I'm pretty sure this court would rule against a tax on unrealized gains. And, this congress would not pass such a tax so this court won't get a chance to rule on the issue.
In the distant future, if we have a congress that would pass such a tax, we may also have a different court.
sentiment 0.87


Share
About
Pricing
Policies
Markets
API
Info
tz UTC-4
Connect with us
ChartExchange Email
ChartExchange on Discord
ChartExchange on X
ChartExchange on Reddit
ChartExchange on GitHub
ChartExchange on YouTube
© 2020 - 2025 ChartExchange LLC