O
Realty Income Corporation
stock NYSE

What is odd to me is job postings/positive local press is lacking.
When Toyota announced their factory in (Liberty, NC) they were all over local news announcing job fairs even partnering with ESC.
I don't recall hearing anything about jobs for Wolf. I checked the website & they have 2 generic postings. If they're going to start producing by summer (it's already mid-May) I would think they would be putting out positive press/attracting talent/attracting shareholders.
Instead it's just been potential bankruptcy article from the N&O.

Hey look what I can do. No Trump that's not a thing. This is what he does everyday. Apply E. O. 's for everything. Why have 3 branches when you just need one. What an idiot. It's not a chain of command. It's nuance, checks and balances.

Yes just O is the ticker

i keep seeing O stock but i am having trouble finding it - is the ticker just O? what is the company name? thank you!

https://preview.redd.it/12npanp8mg0f1.png?width=991&format=png&auto=webp&s=495579c75e9345f70528ceae9020ae2da8cdf44b
Does anybody know the source for Index Wise F&O investments of FIIs? I checked both NSDL and CDSL but no luck

This is true. Although, my opinion is many fail because they make the same predictable mistakes.
One is trading something with volatility and difficulty above their skill level. Most new traders jump right in and want to make money right away. So they chase the popular items chasing returns.
How many posts do you see, I scalp O DTE Nasdaq options…how do I set my stop loss? Life expectancy of that trader about a week- maybe a month if they have a big bankroll.

omg my $15 META fractional share from like 5 years is now $39 O_O

T H E - A R G O - F O R C E (AG7F)

If you really want to do right by your S/O then don’t gamble the whole bag on whatever reserve rights is. 5-10% in the degen bag, tops. If you can’t make that work then you were never going to.

It was not hovering around $75 it peaked there 5 separate times for a few days each then dropped back down lol. Don't get me wrong I'm not defending the stock, but if you're gonna shit on it at least give it a fair shake haha.
$O opened on May, 12 2020 (5y ago) at $51.67 per share and closed today at $55.94 per share. TECHNICALLY you could call that a gain. But 8.2% in 5 years in quite awful. The only reason it saw those spikes to 70+ dollars (happened exactly 5 separate times over the span of exactly a year), is because $O has a tendency to invert the US market in bear markets like 2022 because people buy it to use its dividend as a hedge. Which TO BE FAIR, is actually a strong quality to have as a dividend payer.
Looking at TOTAL return (including dividend) It actually broke even over the past 3 years with a total NAV return of 0.20% (yikes). Also, compared to the 8.2% price return on the past 5 years, it has returned 42.92% including dividend in that time period. Compared to the 119.62% of the S&P500 tho, thats pocket change.

It doesn't matter what people say, especially on reddit, where the Dunning-Kruger effect is supercharged by an echo chamber.
The first things I've learned when I had first looked into investing in the stock market, or anything else, for that matter, was:
\- First, know the difference between investing and trading, these two are different playing fields, requiring different knowledge and strategies. Pick one.
\- Second, learn what "due diligence" means, and exercise it by the book. Do the necessary homework in research for every company you think of investing in. Understand what they do, conduct a financial evaluation, learn what a technical analysis is, i.e. how to read the graphs of a stock's/commodity's history. Stay disciplined, make no exceptions for F.O.M.O., meme stocks, or personal feelings/political ideologies - or else, you'll either end up holding the bag or funding a charity, both of which make other people solvent, not you. Instead, focus on your return of investment, and the universal force of nature to grow your wealth: The baffling power of compound interest for the endgame of getting richer by default.

So, odds Big Pharma takes E.O. to court are...
Say it with me one hundred %

My personal belief is the real estate O holds has too much risk with macro changes to consumer behavior.
However, 24 month outlook is likely positive because of improved rate environment. Offset by chance of non-paying tenants and vacancies.

O

For context, 52Y, pre-tax portfolio, looking to do asset allocation over time. Planning to reallocate 20% into Alternative Income, which I have identified them to be OBDC, MAIN, MLPA, RITM, KBWY, O.
I would like to figure out how much weight to position them in this asset class. I understand that MLPA is UBTI and hence would have to limit my position so that its annual dividend payout is less than $1,000 per retirement account.
Currently have approx. 35% in SGOV and 30% in CLOA in my portfolio.

Well, first, I don't like REITs so RITM, KBWY, and O are out.
MAIN and OBDC are BDCs and they're both fine. I prefer MAIN but it's a matter of personal preference. MAIN trades at a very high premium where OBDC is closer to a 1:1 price/nav ratio. MAIN sees more price appreciation but pays a lower yield. MAIN also has a longer history and better total returns. Both are individual companies though, so that's quite a bit of risk.
MLPA is nice because it's an ETF with a selection of companies in it, though it's limited to a specific sector in energy/oil, which I don't love because it's subject to easy market manipulation by OPEC and other oil producers. For oil, there's always more supply that can be used to flood the market. That's what the giant drop in MLPA is from 2014-2016. The price of oil is kept artificially high by just limiting production. So, to me, this sector isn't one I'd invest too heavily into.
For CLOZ, CLOA, and SGOV, I think the return on CLOZ makes it worthwhile while the yield is above 8% and prefer it over the other to in terms of risk versus reward.
If I had to pick one of these options, I would pick MAIN. Proven history, no dividend cuts, increases dividends regularly, often pays special dividends, great total returns, and solid price appreciation.

Yeah, only 1-2% in that don't go all in on just that. What made you chose just that? Look also at these O, MAIN, ECC, JEPQ, SCHD, PEP, JNJ, VZ and SGOV for temporary cash.

I don't think you get a clear idea about how this works.
For starters I can't pick if I don't see the rest of the portfolio so I can look at concentration and diversification. I like MAIN and O but if the portfolio is 50/50 real estate and BDCs, well I can't pick MAIN/O and would actually suggest to sell and diversify.
And before that there is the question of how old you are, when you plan on retiring, and whether you can pick individual dividends on tax sheltered accounts. There are a lot of younger folks that would be better off with growth but that insist on dividends.
And a 3% yield with a 4% equity growth is actually 35.7% higher than a 4.5% safe rate of return. Not to mention that there is no guarantee that the safe rate will stay that high forever; it hasn't been that long ago when it was under .3%.

A higher yield is a bonus to me. I like having a bit of high risk but should be a stock/etf that I can easily understand. If it is a stock then it must have decent income that can sustain the payout ratio and dividend yield without sacrificing growth. For ETFs, must not have a very huge nav erosion and can recover easily. So among your choices I'd go with O first then may be add a bit of MAIN and OBDC then get SGOV for something of moderate risk.

Ironically enough, MFN was the principal doctrine behind free trade to treat every nation as though on a MFN basis (altho practice ran contrary).
NAL — E.O. Directing rule-making by instructing agencies requires a period of public input and comment (with exceptions) for the proposed rule. Hence it was considered illegal bc it bypassed the public input period and was sued by PhRMA. Hey, I’m for it if it can pass muster. I just find it ironic given the MFN rationale.
As for the latter on importing drugs, first of all — there were industry objections due to a lack of a regulatory framework for finding and approving “equivalent drugs”e.g. drugs from India (most are safe but there are always scandals of tainted or ineffective meds).The secondary and more compelling reason were objection from allied nations (Canada) that this policy may lead to drug shortages in their respective nations.