MA
Mastercard Incorporated
stock NYSE

BB 2day direction and range, day MA, ichi cloud 2day future S/R

GOOG AMZN UNH MA COST. All green except UNH.

Hello, it's me again.
Hope you had a wonderful 4th of July.
Lets get back to business.
Law of Vibration.
[Monthly Rainbow MA](https://preview.redd.it/lex6om6o8bbf1.png?width=1920&format=png&auto=webp&s=130bc6f9d6c16bd89f275de45e238000649422c1)
[Monthly Gaussian Channel](https://preview.redd.it/mcsz5egp8bbf1.png?width=1920&format=png&auto=webp&s=24bb10814699b8748f734a5386fadfb7b9c86f6b)
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NhvU8txIQYI&list=RDNhvU8txIQYI&index=1](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NhvU8txIQYI&list=RDNhvU8txIQYI&index=1)

”Vibration is fundamental; nothing is exempt from this law; it is universal, therefore applicable to every class of phenomena on the globe." - William Delbert Gann
https://preview.redd.it/un70o7ij9bbf1.png?width=320&format=png&auto=webp&s=eee7e539e4e0263745b064165d3ae9dd4769d8e0

# UNH Stock Trading Plan (2025-07-06)
## Final Trading Decision
### Analysis Summary of UNH Trading Models
Based on the provided model reports for UnitedHealth Group (UNH), here’s a comprehensive summary and analysis:
### 1. Model Key Points Summary
**DS Report**:
* **Directional Bias**: Moderate Bullish (LONG) with 68% confidence.
* **Technical Indicators**: Daily price above 10-day MA indicating strength; bullish MACD crossover. Price shows volatility buildup near middle Bollinger Band; key support is strong at $294.
* **Market Sentiment**: Positive retail coverage, low VIX, but some negative news regarding Medicaid sector risks.
* **Trade Execution**: Long position at $308.55, target at $322.50, stop-loss at $304.50, risk...
🔥 Unlock full content: [https://discord.gg/quantsignals](https://discord.gg/quantsignals)
https://preview.redd.it/tdxc2trwqabf1.jpg?width=1120&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6c6479fba7a222062b700bf51c551724afa12330

MELI (35%), AMZN (14%), WIZEY (10%), RKLB (5%), MA (5%)

### DAL Earnings Trade Analysis
---
#### 1. Earnings Context Analysis
* **Valuation Context**: Trading below 200D MA ($54.32) but above rising 10D/50D MAs, indicating mixed signals. Recent close ($50.86) sits near the midpoint of its 52-week range ($34.73-$69.98).
* **Sector Comparison**: Lack of sector/peer data limits analysis, but airline industry dynamics suggest ...
🔥 Unlock full content: [https://discord.gg/quantsignals](https://discord.gg/quantsignals)
https://preview.redd.it/pwis1dm0jabf1.jpg?width=1120&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e5045744d197d424d74993742aada1abfae789b6

MSFT 7%
V and MA. I put these in the same category, for obvious reasons. 8%
PLTR 17%
VOO and VTI 18% of my holdings. This used to be 60% of my portfolio but everything else grew so much faster. I'll need to renew my efforts at my old DCA strategy until this is back in the 50 or 60% range.
WMT 6%
My portfolio is admittedly in need of rebalancing. For example, I've held QCOM and AMT for quite a long time and I should sell off those positions and increase my position in VOO or VTI. Similarly I've opened small speculative positions in a wide variety of various stocks. Some of these are stagnant or haven't grown yet, and some of them have grown really well, and this growth has altered my ideal balance. The growth in MSFT and PLTR really altered my portfolio allocations
My personal ideal balance for my portfolio is 60% VTI/VOO. 20% aggressive growth in tech/finance. 20% defensive stocks/utilities/staples. Back to the old boring DCA strategy I suppose.

V, MA. Wide moat, inflation protected, no debt.

Nearly 80% of my portfolio is BRK.B, MA and UNP. I've owned all of them since around 2010.
Next 2 largest are TT and LMT, which I've owned since around 2020 iirc.

Experiment, but do it consistently and rule based. More factors than just trying to squeeze out a little more RR. For example, does 80% TP back to breakeven make you anxious/stressed? Then create an exit method that does not allow price to come back to breakeven or red. Make this as easy and stress free as you can. You want to avoid emotional inducing situations as that is normally where bigger or compounding errors occur.
Examples of exit methods can be, trail candle lows, use ATR, a close below a MA, set it and forget it (TP or SL and walk away from screen), exit into strength before the "high" or your TP... You can adjust based on your analysis of market conditions or conviction (this is harder to do and allows room to make mistakes, but could be a more dynamic/advanced exit strategy).

MSFT - MA - AMZN - V - HILS

Probably location dependent. What state are you in? In MA in is like Christmas shopping every weekend at malls.

Let’s create a list of probability-based factors for trading setups. I'm **not** talking about MA crossovers, signals, or indicators, just **pure probabilities** based on market behavior.
Here are a few examples to get started:
* **ADR (Average Daily Range):** If the daily ADR is near 100%, there’s a lower probability of the price moving much further that day.
* **ATR (Average True Range):** If the daily ATR is around 100%, it usually means the expected movement has already occurred, reducing the chances of a further significant move.
* **RSI (Relative Strength Index):** If RSI is in the overbought or oversold zone, the price has a lower probability of continuing in the same direction.
* **Support/Resistance Levels:** If the price has reached a strong support or resistance area, there's a lower chance of it breaking through immediately.
These are **just probabilities**, not guarantees, nothing is 100% in trading.
Now it’s your turn:
👉 What are your favorite probability-based setups? Let’s build a valuable list together!

Did this one since quick since eval last ween already.
If you search my comments for VOR, you'll see after someone brought it to my attention I saw it was a legit possible play the night before and it followed my prediction pretty closely. That means it "already ran" but I'll break down why I think it's still in play, and why I think it might not.
CONTINUE POTENTIAL
Held above VWAP + 30% gain zone, closed at HOD range/no fade, still below prior resistance, AH dumped some but not bsd comparitively
STALL POTENTIAL
Typical holiday "hangover" sluggishness, exhaustion risk is no good volume, not catalyst based at this point so needs nice technical picture, RSI hovering around 45 do might indicate cooling and need more FOMO
Look for >150k in PM to signal continued interest. Watch for holding above $1.85-1.87 (bullush) and even a pop past $1.95-2.00 (real momentum, VERY bullish). Below $1.75 here and it'll likely fade. At open to 945, a good scalp of $2.04 to $2.10 is possible if breaks $1.95 with >500k vol. If it tests VWAP (~$1.89) and bounces, I'd watch it but with a tight stop at $1.85. Even worse, if can't hold $1.83 just sit it out, probably profit-taking. Volume <200k would be extra spooky. It'll likely do what it wants around open but by 945-1015 expect a dip after the early push- you'll want to look for a bounce off VWAP/MA lines with the ideal bounce zone at $1.83-1.87. If VWAP sputters and no clear recovery, you're looking at a likely downside to $1.75 or lower.

Which of the following has the most potential to turn 100k into 500k in 4-5 months with a high risk tolerance, but no YOLO plays like 100k into 0DTE WSB style:
* Day trading
* Swing trading
* Long puts / calls
* Option spreads
* others? (no naked options, shorting, Forex please)
My experience so far is ETFs, and trading tech stocks.
I work in tech and that's the sector I'm most comfortable with, and it's volatile which is nice for me.
I'm up a nice amount but want to try hitting more aggressive targets, which of the above approaches would be the most realistic (or a combo of them) in hitting aggressive targets?
So far I've been learning about:
* Swing trading (candlesticks, chart patterns, MA, MACD, position sizing, profit targets, price action, VWAP, volume, market sentiment, RSI, support/ ressistance, ATR, supply / demand, backtesting, stop loss)
* Options trading (Greeks, IV, Theta decay, liquidity, ITM/OTM, spreads, covered calls, liquidity sweeps, IV crush)

CSU, FICO, MA,V,EFX

We’re in a bear cycle by moving average cross until earnings (approximately). I think you’re obligated to address when your forecasting runs contrary to the most basic chart analysis. If you’re forecasting that this bear cycle will be truncated by this stand-out circumstance, cool, but you lay out a historical occurrence with extremely variable reproducibility and severity that conflicts with analysis with a near perfect track record, the MA cross flip from bull to bear cycles. Good forecasting is a balanced conversation.

Stochastic Calculus, Linear Algebra, Bayesian Probability, Log Regression and Fractals. Just to clarify you don’t need to solve equations but need to understand if your result is correct or optimized. People rely on automation a little too much, especially in the last 3 to 4 years.
For an MA strategy your trade response may be lagging so you might need to understand what alternatives are out there and how they are calculated based on your strategy. If you’re lagging you might need EMA for example.

Which of the following has the most potential to turn 100k into 500k in 4-5 months with a high risk tolerance, but no YOLO plays like 100k into 0DTE WSB style:
* Day trading
* Swing trading
* Long puts / calls
* Option spreads
* others? (no naked options, shorting, Forex please)
My experience so far is ETFs, and trading tech stocks.
I work in tech and that's the sector I'm most comfortable with, and it's volatile which is nice for me.
I'm up a nice amount but want to try hitting more aggressive targets, which of the above approaches would be the most realistic (or a combo of them) in hitting aggressive targets?
So far I've been learning about:
* Swing trading (candlesticks, chart patterns, MA, MACD, position sizing, profit targets, price action, VWAP, volume, market sentiment, RSI, support/ ressistance, ATR, supply / demand, backtesting, stop loss)
* Options trading (Greeks, IV, Theta decay, liquidity, ITM/OTM, spreads, covered calls, liquidity sweeps, IV crush)

für neue MA sehr unwahrscheinlich zumindest bei meinem AG. Betrifft viele Altverträge aus < 2010. EG12 und 40h und 14% LZ sind jedoch sehr realistisch.